Is Now the Time to Consider Fractional PR?
Episode Summary
Fractional roles seem to be growing in scope, including in Public Relations. Over the years, we have seen our fair share of creative titles, but does the Fractional title in Communication roles have longevity? In today’s episode, we take an honest look at the fractional title, extract what's actually useful, and give solo PR practitioners a real framework for deciding whether fractional positioning is a fit for them, or whether it's a fashionable label with a new set of obligations attached. The hosts discuss the rate data for fractional roles and adoption projections for midsize companies.
Episode Highlights
- [00:18] Should I adopt the Fractional Title?: Michelle opens before the music: if she put fractional communications director on her website tomorrow, would she be sounding as senior as she actually is — or cosplaying a Silicon Valley CMO? Karen loves the question. It names exactly the tension the episode is built around: the fractional label is real and valuable in the right context, and it is also getting slapped on LinkedIn profiles by people who have changed nothing about how they actually work. Karen and Michelle are committed to examining both sides honestly.
- [02:52] The Rate Data: What Go Fractional's 2026 Benchmarks Actually Show: Go Fractional, a marketplace that publishes its own rate benchmarks by role, shows the fractional director of public relations averaging $203 an hour in 2026, with typical engagements running around 32 hours a week. Karen and Michelle both flag what 32 hours means in solo practice terms: that is essentially all of your billable time for one client. There would be no room for additional work. For broader fractional CMO engagements, monthly retainers commonly run $8,000 to $22,000, with day rates in the $1,500 to $3,500 range and hourly rates around $200 to $350. Karen's bottom line: most solo PR pros are already undercharging. The gap between what solos currently charge and what the fractional rate range represents is a real income conversation, not just a semantic one.
- [06:43] The Adoption Reality: Who Is Actually Buying This: Gartner projected that more than 30% of midsize enterprises will keep at least one fractional executive on retainer by 2027. Karen's honest read: 30% is a meaningful number, but it requires understanding which markets and industries you actually serve. She cautions against chasing the label without first asking whether your specific clients in your specific verticals are operating in the kinds of environments where fractional executive models are being adopted. She also notes an important structural difference: fractional engagements are typically time-bound, one to two years, sometimes as short as six months, while many solo PR practitioners maintain client relationships of five, ten, fifteen years or more. That shift in tenure expectations is not a footnote. It changes the business model.
- [09:44] Objection 1: This Is Just a Trendy Label for Freelancer: Karen names the objection directly: fractional is real. There are fractional CEOs, fractional CFOs, fractional CMOs and it emerged from a genuine market need. Companies wanted senior executive function without a permanent hire, particularly high-growth startups scaling toward a defined goal. The problem is that the label has been diluted by people applying it to what they were already doing. Karen's line: it has to be more than a label. It has to be a real change in how you scope work, structure your time, and price your value. If it's just a rebrand of what you're already doing, it will not hold up to a client's scrutiny.
- [11:08] Objection 2: I Don't Have C-Suite Adjacent Experience: Michelle raises the credibility question: what if you don't have 15-plus years or a director-level background? Can you credibly claim a fractional director title? Karen's answer is yes, with honesty about what you bring. She draws on the Dolly Parton example from a recent piece she'd read: when Barbara Walters made a condescending comment, Dolly didn't get defensive. She owned the narrative and redirected it. Karen's parallel for practitioners: if a client challenges your seniority, you don't deny the gap, you own what you do bring and redirect toward the specific value that makes you the right person for this engagement. Karen also flags what the Solo PR Pro community data shows, many solos left corporate America holding director-level titles. The experience is often already there; the confidence to claim it is the gap.
- [13:28] Objection 3: Clients Will Expect Fixed Weekly Hours I Can't Sustain: This is the structural objection, and Karen says it's the most valid one. Fractional positioning is not a marketing decision; it's an organizational one. It assumes fewer clients getting more defined hours each, not the same scattered client load with a prettier name on top. That is a genuine shift in how you run your business. Karen's reframe: for practitioners who want built-in natural breaks, the project-based nature of fractional work is actually an opportunity. You do a high-value six-month engagement, step back, take time, then pick up the next one. But you have to be genuinely ready to operate that way, not just willing to say you will.
- [16:00] Objection 4: What If a Client Asks What Makes Me Different: The quiet objection: if a prospective client pushes back and asks what actually distinguishes you from any other consultant and you don't have a real answer beyond the title, you have a problem. Karen and Michelle are both direct: if you're going to name it, you have to be ready to back it up. Fractional is not a word that does the positioning work for you. You still have to know what you specifically bring, who specifically you serve, and what result you specifically deliver. The label focuses the conversation. You still have to win it.
- [17:09] The Three-Question Filter for Self-Assessment: Karen's three questions for any solo practitioner genuinely weighing this decision. One: can you honestly commit a defined chunk of weekly hours — ten, twenty, or even thirty-two — to a small number of clients rather than juggling many smaller ones? This is a capacity question, not an aspiration question. Two: have you operated at a senior strategic level where you own the outcomes rather than execute tasks someone else scoped? Be honest about what senior strategic responsibility has actually looked like in your experience. Three: does the pricing range work for the size of client you're actually targeting? The $8,000 to $22,000 monthly range requires clients with budgets to match. If you primarily serve small local businesses or early-stage startups on tighter budgets, fractional may be aspirational for a future client base rather than a realistic current pivot.
- [19:10] The Live Drill: Six Years of Healthcare Comms, Eighteen Months Solo: Michelle walks a hypothetical: a practitioner with six years running healthcare comms in-house, now eighteen months into solo practice, currently juggling five smaller retained clients at different rates. Karen runs the filter. On capacity: consolidating from five scattered clients to two or three larger, more defined engagements is a real structural shift, and the right question is whether the listener can genuinely commit to that model. On experience: six years running healthcare comms in-house is exactly the kind of background that supports a director-level fractional claim credibly. On pricing: if even two or three of those five current clients are midsize or larger organizations, there may be a direct pathway to repricing existing relationships at fractional rates. If the current client base skews toward small local clients on tight budgets, the fractional pivot is a longer play toward a different client type.
- [22:21] Why This Is a Positioning Decision, Not Just a Label Decision: Karen closes on the point the whole episode has been building toward: how you describe your own work shapes what you are allowed to charge for it. Most solo PR pros are already undercharging, not because the market won't bear higher rates, but out of habit and out of fear. The fractional conversation, done honestly, forces a real examination of capacity, value, and pricing that most solos avoid. Even for practitioners who ultimately decide the fractional model isn't the right fit, that conversation has value. Karen is transparent about herself: the corporateness of fractional work, the reporting structures, the Slack pings, the internal politics is not where she wants to be. That's also a real answer, and it's the kind of honest self-assessment the episode is asking every listener to do.
Resources & Additional Information
- Go Fractional: Rate benchmarks by role (2026 data referenced in episode)
- Fractional C-Suite: The Future of Work: Why Fractional Executives are Booming in the AI Era (Gartner Future of Work data)
- Over50Pros: Fractional Work State of the Market Intelligence Report
- That Solo Life, Episode 349: What Solo PR Pros Need to Know Now About the Specialization Economy
- That Solo Life, Episode 355: Why Solo PR Pros Should Plan for Micro Retirement Now
- Solo PR Pro membership community: soloprpro.com
- That Solo Life podcast website: thatsololife.com
Note on sourcing: Karen and Michelle flag on air that some of the broader fractional adoption statistics are difficult to verify precisely — treat aggregate figures as directional rather than definitive.
Host & Show Info
That Solo Life is a podcast created for public relations, communication, and marketing professionals who work as independent and small practitioners. Hosted by Karen Swim, APR, President of Solo PR Pro, and Michelle Kane, Principal of Voice Matters, the show delivers expert insights, encouragement, and practical advice for solo PR pros navigating today's dynamic professional landscape.
Listen to all episodes and catch up on previous conversations at thatsololife.com.
Did this episode inspire you? If you found value in this conversation, please take a moment to leave us a review on your favorite podcast platform. Your feedback helps us reach more solo pros just like you! Don't forget to subscribe so you never miss an episode.
STYLE
::cue(v[voice="Michelle Kane"]) { color: white }
::cue(v[voice="Karen Swim, APR"]) { color: lime }
::cue(v[voice="Speaker 3"]) { color: cyan }
::cue(v[voice="Speaker 4"]) { color: red }
::cue(v[voice="Speaker 5"]) { color: yellow }
1
00:00:18.200 --> 00:00:23.040
communications director on my website
2
00:00:23.040 --> 00:00:28.840
finally sounding as senior as I am?
3
00:00:28.880 --> 00:00:32.880
some Silicon Valley CMO?
4
00:00:35.800 --> 00:00:38.240
I think.
5
00:00:39.520 --> 00:00:42.040
today.
6
00:00:42.040 --> 00:00:43.760
7
00:00:43.760 --> 00:00:49.360
the podcast for independent PR and
8
00:00:49.360 --> 00:00:52.880
business,
9
00:00:53.120 --> 00:00:55.240
10
00:00:55.240 --> 00:00:58.360
PR Pro.
11
00:00:58.520 --> 00:01:01.750
voice matters.
12
00:01:01.750 --> 00:01:03.950
which is awesome.
13
00:01:03.990 --> 00:01:07.150
but it's cool when it's just us. Hopefully
14
00:01:07.150 --> 00:01:08.830
15
00:01:08.870 --> 00:01:13.510
you know,
16
00:01:13.550 --> 00:01:15.590
17
00:01:15.630 --> 00:01:19.350
Economy episode.
18
00:01:19.350 --> 00:01:21.510
check it out.
19
00:01:22.470 --> 00:01:25.790
business,
20
00:01:25.790 --> 00:01:29.310
charge for it.
21
00:01:29.830 --> 00:01:35.070
exploring today is,
22
00:01:35.110 --> 00:01:41.470
and position yourself as a fractional
23
00:01:41.670 --> 00:01:45.150
fractional, you know,
24
00:01:45.190 --> 00:01:52.150
agency of one or a micro agency.
25
00:01:52.350 --> 00:01:56.230
I'm sure some of you are out there rolling
26
00:01:56.230 --> 00:01:59.110
title.
27
00:01:59.110 --> 00:02:03.670
you know, it's okay.
28
00:02:03.670 --> 00:02:06.590
else to use it.
29
00:02:08.350 --> 00:02:09.910
30
00:02:09.910 --> 00:02:13.110
interesting discussion. There's,
31
00:02:13.150 --> 00:02:16.550
about,
32
00:02:16.590 --> 00:02:18.150
33
00:02:18.150 --> 00:02:21.310
CMOs.
34
00:02:21.350 --> 00:02:23.910
35
00:02:23.910 --> 00:02:27.350
but I, you know,
36
00:02:27.390 --> 00:02:29.510
you know,
37
00:02:29.550 --> 00:02:34.190
just tried stuff that's been around forever.
38
00:02:34.230 --> 00:02:38.910
the useful stuff and have a real
39
00:02:38.910 --> 00:02:40.110
40
00:02:40.150 --> 00:02:43.550
everything, everything we source is in our
41
00:02:43.550 --> 00:02:47.310
yeah.
42
00:02:47.470 --> 00:02:49.710
43
00:02:49.710 --> 00:02:52.670
44
00:02:52.910 --> 00:02:59.750
what's it called go fractional and it
45
00:02:59.820 --> 00:03:03.180
46
00:03:03.180 --> 00:03:10.860
public relations specifically the 2026 data
47
00:03:10.860 --> 00:03:15.060
48
00:03:15.500 --> 00:03:19.700
hours a week.
49
00:03:20.300 --> 00:03:22.660
that's not a light touch.
50
00:03:22.700 --> 00:03:26.140
for one client,
51
00:03:26.140 --> 00:03:28.900
52
00:03:28.900 --> 00:03:30.060
53
00:03:30.500 --> 00:03:35.660
32 hours is probably more.
54
00:03:35.660 --> 00:03:36.620
55
00:03:36.620 --> 00:03:40.860
then we can handle.
56
00:03:40.860 --> 00:03:46.980
we don't do the 40 hour work week.
57
00:03:46.980 --> 00:03:50.420
billable hours and then there's billable
58
00:03:50.420 --> 00:03:54.740
that's really all of your billable time.
59
00:03:54.740 --> 00:03:56.580
60
00:03:56.580 --> 00:03:57.580
61
00:03:57.740 --> 00:04:00.580
62
00:04:00.940 --> 00:04:06.340
you know, it's not like I do a bit of PR for
63
00:04:06.340 --> 00:04:07.540
64
00:04:07.580 --> 00:04:08.980
65
00:04:08.980 --> 00:04:13.860
time head of communications and you get a
66
00:04:13.860 --> 00:04:16.620
which is actually kind of how I work with one
67
00:04:16.620 --> 00:04:21.660
but I'm the de facto marketing rep.
68
00:04:21.860 --> 00:04:22.860
69
00:04:22.860 --> 00:04:25.860
number and they'll fall over.
70
00:04:27.140 --> 00:04:29.460
right.
71
00:04:29.460 --> 00:04:38.500
the broader fractional CMO data,
72
00:04:38.740 --> 00:04:42.060
you know,
73
00:04:42.100 --> 00:04:44.820
74
00:04:44.820 --> 00:04:49.820
like,
75
00:04:50.060 --> 00:04:52.180
76
00:04:52.420 --> 00:05:00.060
hourly around two to 2 to 350.
77
00:05:00.170 --> 00:05:05.650
really looking at this almost like a a job.
78
00:05:05.650 --> 00:05:09.970
like I've known fractional CMOs that have had
79
00:05:10.250 --> 00:05:12.850
80
00:05:12.890 --> 00:05:13.890
81
00:05:14.010 --> 00:05:15.970
82
00:05:15.970 --> 00:05:18.210
couple of,
83
00:05:18.250 --> 00:05:22.410
not a lot.
84
00:05:23.650 --> 00:05:25.090
85
00:05:25.690 --> 00:05:28.050
sphere,
86
00:05:28.050 --> 00:05:31.890
it's, it is, as I alluded to before,
87
00:05:31.890 --> 00:05:35.690
us are able to charge,
88
00:05:35.690 --> 00:05:37.690
89
00:05:37.690 --> 00:05:40.810
some ways or.
90
00:05:40.850 --> 00:05:46.290
you know, and we learned this way back at a
91
00:05:46.450 --> 00:05:49.290
I think,
92
00:05:49.730 --> 00:05:55.370
years that most solo PR pros do.
93
00:05:55.410 --> 00:05:58.130
94
00:05:58.130 --> 00:06:04.360
accurately for your expertise and your value
95
00:06:04.400 --> 00:06:09.040
when some of the solos are thinking about,
96
00:06:09.080 --> 00:06:12.680
97
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:15.120
like,
98
00:06:15.160 --> 00:06:19.520
am I worthy of that number?
99
00:06:19.560 --> 00:06:27.160
fractional and what most solo PR pros are
100
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:31.040
conversation to have.
101
00:06:31.080 --> 00:06:39.080
label lets you charge inside that range,
102
00:06:39.520 --> 00:06:42.240
you know, semantics.
103
00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:43.400
104
00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:47.160
taking that the next step,
105
00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:49.240
right?
106
00:06:49.280 --> 00:06:54.000
or potential clients?
107
00:06:54.000 --> 00:06:56.480
thinking,
108
00:06:56.480 --> 00:06:58.040
109
00:06:58.400 --> 00:07:00.320
point.
110
00:07:00.320 --> 00:07:02.000
right?
111
00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:05.920
name or,
112
00:07:06.120 --> 00:07:09.360
you know,
113
00:07:09.400 --> 00:07:13.520
114
00:07:13.520 --> 00:07:17.440
thing.
115
00:07:18.400 --> 00:07:21.800
want to.
116
00:07:21.840 --> 00:07:23.680
117
00:07:23.680 --> 00:07:31.760
than 30% of midsize enterprises will keep at
118
00:07:31.800 --> 00:07:35.920
2027.
119
00:07:35.920 --> 00:07:39.320
120
00:07:39.880 --> 00:07:41.520
121
00:07:41.520 --> 00:07:42.400
122
00:07:42.400 --> 00:07:49.200
35 rising to 48%,
123
00:07:49.400 --> 00:07:55.040
there's, it's hard to find some hard facts
124
00:07:55.040 --> 00:08:00.390
I think the best way to research this is to
125
00:08:01.190 --> 00:08:04.790
industries you serve and see,
126
00:08:04.830 --> 00:08:09.110
and are people open to it?
127
00:08:09.150 --> 00:08:13.830
hey, have you guys ever considered,
128
00:08:14.030 --> 00:08:17.910
129
00:08:17.910 --> 00:08:21.230
about yet either.
130
00:08:21.230 --> 00:08:23.710
131
00:08:23.750 --> 00:08:29.030
engagement.
132
00:08:29.030 --> 00:08:33.190
for solos, we often have engagements that can
133
00:08:33.190 --> 00:08:35.950
15 years or longer.
134
00:08:35.950 --> 00:08:37.950
135
00:08:38.430 --> 00:08:41.790
engagements.
136
00:08:42.550 --> 00:08:46.190
sometimes they're shorter than that because
137
00:08:46.190 --> 00:08:49.790
specific growth spurt.
138
00:08:49.790 --> 00:08:52.870
a six month engagement.
139
00:08:52.870 --> 00:08:55.310
comfortable with.
140
00:08:55.510 --> 00:08:59.750
you know, we're looking at this from all
141
00:08:59.750 --> 00:09:03.150
oh, that sounds so impressive.
142
00:09:03.190 --> 00:09:06.990
so we're keeping it real for everybody,
143
00:09:06.990 --> 00:09:08.710
144
00:09:08.910 --> 00:09:10.830
145
00:09:10.830 --> 00:09:13.350
you know, the questions,
146
00:09:13.350 --> 00:09:17.430
ignore things that are happening.
147
00:09:17.430 --> 00:09:19.270
148
00:09:19.270 --> 00:09:19.790
149
00:09:19.790 --> 00:09:23.670
that is a fit for what you're doing.
150
00:09:23.670 --> 00:09:26.830
fractional.
151
00:09:27.110 --> 00:09:31.030
and I love even how you said that to look at
152
00:09:31.030 --> 00:09:34.790
it's possible. I mean, isn't that what we all
153
00:09:34.790 --> 00:09:37.270
154
00:09:37.270 --> 00:09:39.670
that.
155
00:09:39.670 --> 00:09:41.510
156
00:09:41.550 --> 00:09:44.510
doing this?
157
00:09:44.670 --> 00:09:52.070
this is just a trendy label for freelancer or
158
00:09:52.230 --> 00:09:56.710
not substance.
159
00:09:57.510 --> 00:10:00.620
and that's fair because you know, a lot of
160
00:10:00.620 --> 00:10:04.580
LinkedIn headline without changing anything
161
00:10:04.580 --> 00:10:06.700
because they think,
162
00:10:06.700 --> 00:10:09.580
moment in
163
00:10:09.580 --> 00:10:10.820
164
00:10:11.660 --> 00:10:14.620
right? We've been here with the cute titles.
165
00:10:14.620 --> 00:10:16.180
166
00:10:16.740 --> 00:10:17.940
167
00:10:17.940 --> 00:10:20.700
there's fractional CEOs,
168
00:10:20.700 --> 00:10:22.100
169
00:10:22.100 --> 00:10:27.620
companies wanting to hire,
170
00:10:27.900 --> 00:10:31.940
that function in that role,
171
00:10:31.940 --> 00:10:35.580
engagement.
172
00:10:35.580 --> 00:10:41.580
fractional execs with lightning quick speed.
173
00:10:42.020 --> 00:10:46.340
through three fractional CMOs in a year.
174
00:10:46.340 --> 00:10:47.740
175
00:10:48.140 --> 00:10:53.740
sort of test as a pathway to permanent.
176
00:10:54.260 --> 00:11:00.890
growth startups that really are,
177
00:11:00.930 --> 00:11:03.850
you know,
178
00:11:03.890 --> 00:11:07.530
but they want people to do
179
00:11:07.570 --> 00:11:08.730
180
00:11:08.730 --> 00:11:11.370
181
00:11:11.370 --> 00:11:12.930
182
00:11:13.650 --> 00:11:16.330
well, gosh, I don't have,
183
00:11:16.370 --> 00:11:21.850
background,
184
00:11:21.850 --> 00:11:28.050
level fractional title?
185
00:11:28.090 --> 00:11:31.130
overselling yourself.
186
00:11:31.130 --> 00:11:32.810
187
00:11:32.810 --> 00:11:40.530
get in our own way of diminishing the value
188
00:11:40.530 --> 00:11:42.570
189
00:11:42.610 --> 00:11:46.410
find the source,
190
00:11:46.410 --> 00:11:53.570
about Dolly Parton and the lessons learned
191
00:11:53.570 --> 00:11:57.490
some rude things like,
192
00:11:57.490 --> 00:11:58.810
193
00:11:59.130 --> 00:12:04.410
defensive about it,
194
00:12:04.770 --> 00:12:08.530
of the comments.
195
00:12:08.530 --> 00:12:13.130
but leaned in and redirected it and made it
196
00:12:13.130 --> 00:12:18.930
wrote the book talked about how we all should
197
00:12:18.930 --> 00:12:20.490
198
00:12:20.530 --> 00:12:23.890
CEO,
199
00:12:24.290 --> 00:12:28.530
but then you can counter back with,
200
00:12:28.570 --> 00:12:32.050
which actually makes me a great candidate for
201
00:12:32.050 --> 00:12:35.530
and from a different perspective.
202
00:12:35.530 --> 00:12:37.010
203
00:12:37.370 --> 00:12:43.210
something that you feel like you can't fail.
204
00:12:43.250 --> 00:12:49.650
results that you know they want,
205
00:12:49.690 --> 00:12:56.570
director or higher level fractional title.
206
00:12:56.730 --> 00:13:00.560
because we're not wearing power suits here at
207
00:13:00.560 --> 00:13:05.880
walking into specific types of rented,
208
00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:11.160
thinking doing the same kind of thought
209
00:13:11.160 --> 00:13:13.240
you know?
210
00:13:13.280 --> 00:13:15.880
objection. The third one,
211
00:13:16.320 --> 00:13:21.800
you know, won't clients expect a fixed weekly
212
00:13:21.800 --> 00:13:26.440
sustain across multiple clients,
213
00:13:26.440 --> 00:13:27.880
214
00:13:28.560 --> 00:13:30.800
you know,
215
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:35.080
and it's, it's a very valid objection because
216
00:13:35.400 --> 00:13:39.040
you know,
217
00:13:39.080 --> 00:13:41.720
you know,
218
00:13:41.760 --> 00:13:44.840
company is set up.
219
00:13:45.400 --> 00:13:50.640
the assumption and the way that many people
220
00:13:50.640 --> 00:13:54.360
fewer clients.
221
00:13:54.360 --> 00:13:59.110
you know, different clients at a time.
222
00:13:59.390 --> 00:14:02.910
you know,
223
00:14:02.950 --> 00:14:08.150
other engagement.
224
00:14:08.150 --> 00:14:12.550
load with just,
225
00:14:12.590 --> 00:14:14.110
226
00:14:14.110 --> 00:14:17.310
business.
227
00:14:17.710 --> 00:14:20.870
that.
228
00:14:20.870 --> 00:14:26.870
that likes to build in natural breaks,
229
00:14:27.270 --> 00:14:31.150
you know,
230
00:14:31.190 --> 00:14:35.150
projects because they are projects,
231
00:14:35.150 --> 00:14:40.470
projects and you can space them out.
232
00:14:40.470 --> 00:14:42.990
getting, you know,
233
00:14:43.430 --> 00:14:48.950
but then you have the benefit of maybe taking
234
00:14:48.950 --> 00:14:51.430
235
00:14:51.590 --> 00:14:54.510
project or two.
236
00:14:54.550 --> 00:14:57.990
237
00:14:57.990 --> 00:14:59.150
238
00:14:59.430 --> 00:15:00.950
239
00:15:00.950 --> 00:15:03.830
worth,
240
00:15:04.150 --> 00:15:06.470
you know,
241
00:15:06.470 --> 00:15:09.990
buyer.
242
00:15:09.990 --> 00:15:13.830
I own them.
243
00:15:13.830 --> 00:15:19.350
owned it for a month and then I'd want that
244
00:15:19.350 --> 00:15:20.870
245
00:15:20.870 --> 00:15:24.270
problem that isn't covered right. And I'll
246
00:15:24.270 --> 00:15:27.470
you know, kindly called me on it.
247
00:15:27.510 --> 00:15:28.990
248
00:15:28.990 --> 00:15:32.430
don't point out my buying thing.
249
00:15:32.430 --> 00:15:33.750
250
00:15:33.750 --> 00:15:38.430
you just didn't sit back to go,
251
00:15:38.790 --> 00:15:40.790
252
00:15:41.270 --> 00:15:44.230
way,
253
00:15:44.230 --> 00:15:46.590
buyer,
254
00:15:46.630 --> 00:15:48.350
255
00:15:48.510 --> 00:15:49.510
256
00:15:49.510 --> 00:15:51.510
257
00:15:51.510 --> 00:15:54.990
you better be ready to deliver it if you're
258
00:15:54.990 --> 00:15:57.030
259
00:15:57.030 --> 00:15:58.980
260
00:15:58.980 --> 00:16:00.620
261
00:16:00.980 --> 00:16:08.980
what actually makes me different from any
262
00:16:08.980 --> 00:16:13.300
answer beyond the title?
263
00:16:14.020 --> 00:16:18.460
if you're going to name it,
264
00:16:18.460 --> 00:16:20.660
265
00:16:22.860 --> 00:16:23.860
266
00:16:24.100 --> 00:16:25.260
267
00:16:25.980 --> 00:16:27.580
268
00:16:31.020 --> 00:16:32.020
269
00:16:33.420 --> 00:16:36.180
270
00:16:36.900 --> 00:16:38.420
271
00:16:38.460 --> 00:16:39.900
272
00:16:41.980 --> 00:16:44.020
273
00:16:44.020 --> 00:16:48.980
change in how you scope out work,
274
00:16:48.980 --> 00:16:51.860
how you price your time.
275
00:16:52.300 --> 00:16:56.580
you're already doing.
276
00:16:56.620 --> 00:16:59.660
lens,
277
00:16:59.700 --> 00:17:05.580
a way to actually decide if this is right for
278
00:17:05.580 --> 00:17:07.540
sounds good.
279
00:17:07.540 --> 00:17:08.620
280
00:17:09.660 --> 00:17:13.300
281
00:17:13.300 --> 00:17:16.780
yourself,
282
00:17:17.220 --> 00:17:26.220
weekly hours to so ten,
283
00:17:26.220 --> 00:17:32.900
clients rather than juggling a lot of
284
00:17:32.900 --> 00:17:33.940
285
00:17:33.980 --> 00:17:36.940
286
00:17:37.220 --> 00:17:40.900
your,
287
00:17:41.140 --> 00:17:48.180
at a senior strategic level where you own the
288
00:17:48.180 --> 00:17:54.180
PR consultants,
289
00:17:54.660 --> 00:17:59.050
little bit broader.
290
00:17:59.050 --> 00:18:04.490
somebody else is actually scoped for you.
291
00:18:04.490 --> 00:18:06.570
292
00:18:06.890 --> 00:18:08.850
293
00:18:09.370 --> 00:18:11.290
294
00:18:11.650 --> 00:18:13.290
295
00:18:13.290 --> 00:18:15.770
296
00:18:16.010 --> 00:18:23.530
month territory or 200 plus an hour,
297
00:18:23.890 --> 00:18:27.650
client that you're targeting?
298
00:18:27.650 --> 00:18:32.890
need to really factor that in.
299
00:18:32.930 --> 00:18:34.490
300
00:18:34.490 --> 00:18:40.770
since this is a Silicon Valley term,
301
00:18:40.970 --> 00:18:46.130
not every business is going to have that.
302
00:18:46.130 --> 00:18:50.050
you want to start working,
303
00:18:50.250 --> 00:18:53.650
with smaller budgets,
304
00:18:53.690 --> 00:18:58.400
maybe your ongoing relationships.
305
00:18:58.400 --> 00:19:02.000
it doesn't have to be a huge pivot right
306
00:19:02.000 --> 00:19:04.080
307
00:19:04.080 --> 00:19:09.440
for a midsize healthcare
308
00:19:09.440 --> 00:19:10.720
309
00:19:11.000 --> 00:19:12.000
310
00:19:12.320 --> 00:19:17.960
and right now they're juggling about five
311
00:19:17.960 --> 00:19:21.360
different rates.
312
00:19:21.920 --> 00:19:26.840
clients is exhausting.
313
00:19:27.600 --> 00:19:32.000
a lot during the course of a day or the
314
00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:36.880
incredible workflow to just really be able to
315
00:19:36.920 --> 00:19:40.680
you're,
316
00:19:40.720 --> 00:19:45.520
is due them per the scope of work in the
317
00:19:45.560 --> 00:19:51.800
you know, as you are looking at this,
318
00:19:51.840 --> 00:19:56.240
what's my weekly capacity for a small number
319
00:19:56.240 --> 00:20:05.280
were going to consolidate down to like 2 or 3
320
00:20:05.280 --> 00:20:07.600
321
00:20:07.880 --> 00:20:13.760
seeing, is this label going to fit the way
322
00:20:13.760 --> 00:20:16.440
323
00:20:16.720 --> 00:20:20.680
theoretical person through.
324
00:20:20.680 --> 00:20:25.000
experience.
325
00:20:25.680 --> 00:20:28.480
you know,
326
00:20:28.520 --> 00:20:34.040
that's exactly the kind of background that
327
00:20:34.040 --> 00:20:36.680
328
00:20:36.680 --> 00:20:42.600
actually left corporate America with director
329
00:20:42.600 --> 00:20:46.560
you know, a lot of our audience qualifies.
330
00:20:46.560 --> 00:20:50.080
you know, mid-career or earlier stage career
331
00:20:50.080 --> 00:20:54.680
this is, you know, for you that this is not
332
00:20:54.680 --> 00:20:55.960
333
00:20:56.240 --> 00:21:01.230
of course, does the pricing range fit,
334
00:21:01.590 --> 00:21:02.990
335
00:21:03.990 --> 00:21:10.230
if even 2 or 3 of them are midsize
336
00:21:10.230 --> 00:21:16.550
that could pay you the rate of a fractional,
337
00:21:16.990 --> 00:21:18.750
338
00:21:18.950 --> 00:21:22.710
you know,
339
00:21:22.830 --> 00:21:29.030
and reaching to,
340
00:21:29.230 --> 00:21:32.230
new clients.
341
00:21:32.270 --> 00:21:35.110
but that's just a little bit of a longer
342
00:21:35.110 --> 00:21:40.470
and it needs to be very strategic.
343
00:21:40.470 --> 00:21:44.270
344
00:21:44.310 --> 00:21:48.390
tighter budgets or maybe small start ups,
345
00:21:48.390 --> 00:21:54.950
fractional is more aspirational than,
346
00:21:54.990 --> 00:21:56.470
347
00:21:56.510 --> 00:22:00.670
you should take right now.
348
00:22:01.070 --> 00:22:03.390
with,
349
00:22:03.590 --> 00:22:07.030
our business development.
350
00:22:07.070 --> 00:22:08.790
351
00:22:08.790 --> 00:22:11.710
these things take time.
352
00:22:11.710 --> 00:22:14.830
it,
353
00:22:14.870 --> 00:22:19.910
creating new relationships and,
354
00:22:19.910 --> 00:22:21.390
355
00:22:21.910 --> 00:22:26.270
you know, I think it's more about,
356
00:22:26.630 --> 00:22:29.950
positioning yourself,
357
00:22:29.990 --> 00:22:34.350
not yeah.
358
00:22:34.390 --> 00:22:39.830
as we know, even though what we do is very
359
00:22:39.830 --> 00:22:44.390
other businesses still don't understand what
360
00:22:44.390 --> 00:22:50.950
this, you know, term does help them at least
361
00:22:50.950 --> 00:22:55.550
let's tie this back.
362
00:22:55.550 --> 00:23:00.460
line on our website?
363
00:23:00.860 --> 00:23:04.260
our own work,
364
00:23:04.260 --> 00:23:09.740
started to is it shapes what we're allowed to
365
00:23:09.780 --> 00:23:11.300
366
00:23:11.300 --> 00:23:12.020
367
00:23:12.020 --> 00:23:16.620
you know, out of habit,
368
00:23:16.660 --> 00:23:21.380
the market actually will bear.
369
00:23:21.380 --> 00:23:26.540
like, why aren't you charging $300 an hour,
370
00:23:26.740 --> 00:23:30.860
why isn't that not mapping back?
371
00:23:31.220 --> 00:23:34.380
372
00:23:34.380 --> 00:23:36.940
they're afraid to
373
00:23:36.940 --> 00:23:38.100
374
00:23:38.100 --> 00:23:38.420
375
00:23:38.420 --> 00:23:43.900
you know, if you use this label honestly,
376
00:23:43.940 --> 00:23:48.780
about capacity and value.
377
00:23:49.340 --> 00:23:52.900
conversations with ourselves.
378
00:23:52.900 --> 00:23:54.900
379
00:23:56.970 --> 00:23:58.490
380
00:23:59.930 --> 00:24:02.450
honestly,
381
00:24:02.450 --> 00:24:04.690
382
00:24:04.730 --> 00:24:06.690
383
00:24:06.690 --> 00:24:09.330
384
00:24:09.330 --> 00:24:10.890
385
00:24:10.890 --> 00:24:15.450
laptop and a Canva account calling themselves
386
00:24:15.450 --> 00:24:21.010
I'm going to go do brain surgery because I
387
00:24:21.050 --> 00:24:22.330
388
00:24:22.330 --> 00:24:25.130
another day.
389
00:24:25.130 --> 00:24:28.290
390
00:24:28.290 --> 00:24:32.530
seasoning and
391
00:24:33.090 --> 00:24:34.890
392
00:24:35.170 --> 00:24:38.250
we always say this,
393
00:24:38.250 --> 00:24:42.730
this has to happen in like a little bubble,
394
00:24:43.130 --> 00:24:46.330
you know, within your networking groups,
395
00:24:46.330 --> 00:24:50.370
with colleagues to stress test some of this
396
00:24:50.370 --> 00:24:53.010
else,
397
00:24:53.010 --> 00:24:58.130
made that,
398
00:24:58.170 --> 00:25:01.410
some real insight.
399
00:25:01.450 --> 00:25:05.890
fractional CMOs is smart too,
400
00:25:05.930 --> 00:25:09.290
you know,
401
00:25:09.330 --> 00:25:12.530
day.
402
00:25:12.730 --> 00:25:19.330
that I've seen a lot of fractional CMOs and
403
00:25:19.370 --> 00:25:22.970
but, you know, adjacent because we work
404
00:25:22.970 --> 00:25:28.850
while and they're not immune to burnout and
405
00:25:28.850 --> 00:25:31.210
406
00:25:31.210 --> 00:25:34.210
involved,
407
00:25:34.410 --> 00:25:39.530
whole thing.
408
00:25:40.090 --> 00:25:42.370
409
00:25:42.370 --> 00:25:47.730
audience knows what that means.
410
00:25:47.770 --> 00:25:52.290
you know, like me, I could do with less of
411
00:25:52.290 --> 00:25:55.130
politics.
412
00:25:55.130 --> 00:25:58.040
413
00:25:58.040 --> 00:26:03.520
reports that report on the report that report
414
00:26:03.520 --> 00:26:05.960
all day,
415
00:26:05.960 --> 00:26:08.400
Slack.
416
00:26:09.040 --> 00:26:11.520
I'm going.
417
00:26:13.200 --> 00:26:15.000
418
00:26:15.440 --> 00:26:21.240
and you know, and of course,
419
00:26:21.240 --> 00:26:24.400
there's always our group,
420
00:26:24.640 --> 00:26:28.720
this is where we hash this stuff out,
421
00:26:28.760 --> 00:26:32.640
honest conversations.
422
00:26:32.640 --> 00:26:39.200
directly at that solo.com.
423
00:26:39.200 --> 00:26:42.880
with you too.
424
00:26:42.920 --> 00:26:47.120
here to help each other do well,
425
00:26:47.360 --> 00:26:50.880
own
426
00:26:50.880 --> 00:26:52.120
427
00:26:52.840 --> 00:26:54.720
428
00:26:54.760 --> 00:26:55.960
429
00:26:56.120 --> 00:26:57.920
430
00:26:59.360 --> 00:27:01.080
431
00:27:01.120 --> 00:27:03.760
our sourcing breakdown,
432
00:27:03.760 --> 00:27:07.160
to be in there.
433
00:27:07.280 --> 00:27:11.880
talked about at the top of this one is all
434
00:27:11.920 --> 00:27:15.200
life.com.
435
00:27:15.320 --> 00:27:19.680
anything from it.
436
00:27:19.680 --> 00:27:25.360
we can attract more fun solos to the party.
437
00:27:25.840 --> 00:27:26.960
438
00:27:26.960 --> 00:27:29.920
you today.
439
00:27:29.920 --> 00:27:31.080
440
00:27:31.360 --> 00:27:34.320
441
00:27:34.320 --> 00:27:36.360